Need help choosing? Speak to a filling-machine specialist about your product, pack and output.

01494 623015 sales@lancinguk.com
Filling Machines UK by Lancing Ltd

Representative filling equipment

Filling machine examples for liquid, paste, powder and specialist products

Use these equipment pages to compare dosing principles, nozzle formats and operating ranges. They are not a substitute for product trials: final performance must be confirmed with the intended formulation, pack, output and line conditions.

Request a filling-machine quoteUse the enquiry checklist
Automatic volumetric filling machine

Equipment comparison

Representative machines

Each page records source-path imagery, reference specifications, application notes and the project data needed before quotation.

Search by machine family

Compare the wider filling range

Liquid filling machines

Specify liquid filling machines for water-like products, oils, detergents, chemicals and beverages. Compare pump, piston, peristaltic and level filling.

See options

Weigh filling machines

Weigh filling machines for oils, liquids, powders and granules. Compare net-weight, pump-and-scale and multihead weighing around accuracy and output.

See options

ATEX filling machines

ATEX filling machinery for solvents, fuels and flammable liquids. Plan zoning, equipment category, earthing, ventilation, materials and line controls.

See options

Filling lines

Plan complete filling lines for bottles, jars, cans, pouches and larger containers. Integrate filling, capping, labelling, coding and conveyors.

See options

Reference data and product trials

Nominal outputs, fill ranges and accuracy figures are application-dependent. Product behaviour, dose size, nozzle bore, pack handling, operator workflow, utilities and downstream constraints all influence the final result. The commercial specification and acceptance test take precedence over website data.

Ready to discuss your application?

Compare the equipment against your real product and pack

Tell us what you fill, your fill range, container and target output. We will help you narrow the practical machine options before quotation.

Tell us what you fill Call 01494 623015

Use model examples correctly

Treat each machine card as a route to investigate, not a performance promise

Model pages are useful for understanding possible layouts, dosing principles and levels of automation. They do not remove the need to confirm product suitability, pack handling, utilities, change parts and the conditions behind any reference data.

Evidence to requestWhy it changes the selectionWhat a useful record contains
Representative product trialFlow, foam, particles, stringing, dust and temperature can change fill quality and cycle time.Product condition, dose, settings, nozzle or tooling, observations and measured results.
Pack-handling trialContainer instability or a tight opening can limit nozzle entry and automatic indexing.Smallest and largest packs, closure route, guide settings, reject causes and change parts.
Output basisAn isolated dosing cycle may not equal sustainable filled and closed packs.Product, dose, pack, run duration, replenishment, operator tasks and connected equipment.
Cleaning and changeover methodAccess and product recovery affect downtime, cross-contamination risk and staffing.Parts removed, tools, flush or manual steps, drain points, recipes and restart checks.
Scope and battery limitsThe filler may depend on tanks, pumps, conveyors, cap equipment, guarding or controls outside the core machine.Clear inclusion, exclusion and interface schedule covering mechanical, electrical and control responsibilities.

Shortlist in a controlled sequence

Move from process requirement to model comparison

  1. 1

    Define the application envelope

    List every product, dose and pack, then identify the most difficult combination rather than designing around an easy average.

  2. 2

    Choose the likely filling principles

    Use the filling technology overview and selection guide to keep viable alternatives open.

  3. 3

    Compare automation levels

    Separate the need for repeatable dosing from the need for automatic container handling. The semi-automatic versus automatic guide helps make that boundary explicit.

  4. 4

    Trial the difficult edge cases

    Test the products and packs most likely to expose foam, cut-off, dust, stability or changeover limitations.

  5. 5

    Freeze the complete supplied scope

    Record product feed, filling, closing, labelling, guarding, controls, documentation, installation and acceptance before final quotation comparison.

Review the machine shortlist

Read model data in context

Normalise reference specifications before comparing filling machines

Machine data is most useful when every supplier describes it on the same basis. A range, output or accuracy statement can be valid for a particular product and setup while remaining unsuitable for a different pack or operating condition. Convert each model page into a comparison record that separates published reference information from application-specific proof.

Reference itemWhat the headline may not showComparable project record
Fill rangeOne cylinder, pump, tube, auger or weighing arrangement may not cover the complete stated range with the same resolution, speed or changeover method.Minimum, maximum and important intermediate doses, with the required change parts and settings identified.
Accuracy or repeatabilityThe result can depend on product condition, feed stability, dose, sample method, container handling and whether the result is measured by mass, volume or level.Target, tolerance, measurement method, sample basis, product condition and treatment of start-up or rejected packs.
OutputAn isolated machine cycle may exclude product replenishment, container loading, settling, closure application, checks, stops and changeovers.Sustainable good packs over an agreed run, with operator tasks and connected equipment stated.
Number of filling headsMore heads do not automatically increase completed-pack output if product supply, indexing, closing or pack handling becomes the governing constraint.Line balance showing the required head count, fill time, index time and downstream capacity.
Product-contact materialsA general material description may not define every seal, hose, tube, valve, pump, gasket or surface that touches the product.A contact-parts schedule reviewed against product information and the intended cleaning method.
Container rangeHeight and diameter limits do not prove stability, nozzle access, guide adjustment or closure-ready presentation.Approved pack drawings or samples, guide and support concept, change parts and acceptance observations.
UtilitiesNominal electrical or air data may exclude ancillary pumps, heaters, extraction, compressors, conveyors or product-feed equipment.A complete utility schedule with connection points, responsibility and simultaneous demand considered.
Automation and controlsTerms such as automatic, recipe control or line-ready can cover very different container handling, signal, data and operator functions.A functional description of normal running, changeover, faults, reset, interfaces, permissions and records.

Give every claim a status

Mark data as reference, qualified, verified or still to be tested

Reference data helps create the first shortlist. A qualification states the conditions or exclusions behind that data. Verification comes from supplied documentation, drawings or a representative test. Anything not yet closed should remain an open test point rather than being treated as confirmed.

  • Reference: published model information used for initial screening.
  • Qualified: information that applies only under stated product, pack or operating conditions.
  • Verified: evidence accepted for the project through documentation or representative testing.
  • Open: a requirement assigned to a trial, design review, FAT or SAT check.

Keep the shortlist controlled

Compare the difficult combinations before choosing the preferred model

Use the thickest, foamiest, dustiest or most particle-laden product; the smallest opening; the largest and smallest dose; and the least stable pack to test the edges of the required range. Review the selection process and the evidence checklist before asking for a final model recommendation.

Review the model comparison

Select by process risk

Use the machine range as a route to evidence, not a catalogue shortcut

Different products and packs can sit within the same broad machine family. Use the questions below to decide which pages and tests should lead the application review.

Uncertain dosing principle

Compare positive displacement, pump, peristaltic, level, auger and weigh routes before choosing a model family.

Foam and aeration

Trace upstream air, nozzle profile, headspace and settling through to closure.

When a machine appears suitable, continue to trial planning, quantity acceptance and project acceptance before the application is treated as proved.

CallEnquire